New Zealand is a long way from most places.
If you're flying from London, Bangkok is about half way. If you have a globe,
turn it so that New Zealand is in the bottom left and the Americas on the right
- you'll see there's a great deal of water between the two. Where I'm situated,
in Bodhinyanarama Monastery, is not so remote by local standards, but it is at
the dead-end of one fork of a cul-de-sac. Anything coming up this road is going
to be the one or two cars per day heading for the monastery. Quiet. I am living
up on a ridge at the farthest extreme from the cluster of buildings that
comprise the main site; a good climb away up a track that can only be done on
foot. (This particular hut can't even be photographed, because there's nowhere
you can see it from.) The forest is dense, so there's not much of a view; the
dense tunnel of foliage only offers small windows through the surrounding bush.
So, I’m living pretty much off the map.
It's a natural place for retreat. Nowhere to go, no duties, no visitors; a
stove to boil up rainwater, with the event of the day being the descent to the
kitchen to receive food - which I eat on my own. Contact is minimal. Which is
fitting, as in the texts which guide my Dhamma practice, contact is problematic and something to be worked with:
'One insight is that contact is the basis of suffering. The other is that by the complete cooling and cessation of contact no more suffering is produced.' (Sutta-Nipata 735)*
Some of these suttas are especially direct. In one instance, (S.12.63) the Buddha likens contact to the experience a flayed cow would have, skinless, being constantly bitten by flies. 'Goodness', one wonders, 'How would his disciples manage to get through a day in even a quiet town, let alone a daily commute through the subway? Going about one’s daily business doesn't seem that painful - or am I just thick-skinned?' But the passage is a parable, and the language is striking to drive home a point – one that becomes clear when when you sit still for a while. Because when one isn’t engaging with them, sights, sounds, touches, and especially thoughts, set up a restless need to either act on them, block them or somehow manage them. True enough, contact is the origin of action (kamma). It gets you going; and it doesn’t stop when you want it to. But senses being the way they are, how could it cease?
'One insight is that contact is the basis of suffering. The other is that by the complete cooling and cessation of contact no more suffering is produced.' (Sutta-Nipata 735)*
Some of these suttas are especially direct. In one instance, (S.12.63) the Buddha likens contact to the experience a flayed cow would have, skinless, being constantly bitten by flies. 'Goodness', one wonders, 'How would his disciples manage to get through a day in even a quiet town, let alone a daily commute through the subway? Going about one’s daily business doesn't seem that painful - or am I just thick-skinned?' But the passage is a parable, and the language is striking to drive home a point – one that becomes clear when when you sit still for a while. Because when one isn’t engaging with them, sights, sounds, touches, and especially thoughts, set up a restless need to either act on them, block them or somehow manage them. True enough, contact is the origin of action (kamma). It gets you going; and it doesn’t stop when you want it to. But senses being the way they are, how could it cease?
Yes, the other thing that you notice on
retreat is that even when visual, auditory and tactile contact are quiet and
stable, the patter of thoughts on the mind urges a response: ‘Do this, plan
this, remember this, focus on breathing, stop thinking…’ and so on. And dealing
with, or understanding, this downpour is what a retreat is for. It’s not so
much an escape from the world as a direct handling of (and release from) the
basis of anyone’s world. The world that is arising within one’s mind is based on
ingrained notions – of past, future, oneself and others – that have no
solid and dependable reality. This framework for our lives is entirely
concocted by mind – with its prejudices and blind spots.
Mind is the forerunner of all phenomena;
mind is chief, they are made by mind.
(Dhammapada 1,1)
The inaccuracy extends even beyond the realm of notions. Neurologist Rick Hanson, in ‘Buddha’s Brain’ offers this perspective on all forms of sense-contact:
'much of what you see "out there"
is actually manufactured "in here" by your brain ... Only a small
fraction of the input to your occipital lobes comes from the external world;
the rest comes from internal memory stores and perceptual-processing modules.'
*
The message from this is that the 'world
out there' is being constantly assembled from a fuzzy and barely received field
of data by our conditioned minds. So
contact, the means by which something takes shape in consciousness, is not as
straightforward as it might seem. In the Buddha's analysis it arises as a
two-fold process: 'impact contact' (patigha phassa) and 'interpretation
contact' (adhivacana phassa). Impact contact is the landing of a sight, sound,
touch or idea (etc.) at the respective sense-door. As when someone mentions a
word or phrase that you don't understand: your thinking mind still registers
that something has happened. After the impact come the interpretations: what this
phenomenon reminds me of. What that person looks like. What that voice tone
implies; and so on. And these are the subjective impressions that we act upon,
or react to. Often in meeting someone for the first time, your mind is searching
for signs to form an internal impression of whether this person is trustworthy
(or whatever your intentions are). But you don't always get it right. And
sometimes your intentions (I want you to be reliable) bias your
interpretations; your attention doesn't notice the signs that don't fit the
wished-for picture. It works the other way too: your biases form a negative
impression of a person and you miss the positive. So attention gets distracted
by intentions and a priori perceptions of what Danes or actors or
homeless people are like.
The crucial piece is that we navigate our
lives through attention (which is biased by interest and partial for much of
the time), intention (the shifting push of motivations, skilful or unskilful)
that direct our attention, and contact, from which the agreeable or
disagreeable feelings spring that catch our attention and steer our intentions.
This system is analogous to a three people attempting to drive a car: intention
is the driver, but he/she keeps changing their mind, is impatient and relies on
attention to navigate. Attention can scan, look for signs, but gets distracted;
so it relies on a map-reader to inform him/her as to what signs to look out
for. The map-reader is contact. It relays what impressions it is experiencing and
informs the other two that these perceptions are the real world. Unfortunately,
the signs that contact studies may be unrelated to
the journey. No matter how much we might say, 'That painful feeling was due to a
memory, it has nothing to do with going to Florence.' Contact, affected by the
memory of tyrannical Aunt Florence interprets ‘this trip to Florence is a bad
idea. Let's go somewhere else.’ Sounds improbable? But to what degree do people
vote for someone with a ready smile or a sincere manner, without studying what
his/her policies entail? Why do
dark-skinned people in pale-skinned nations attract suspicion and even attack?
To expand the analogy, the contact that
moves us isn't direct sensory contact, or reasoned attention, but
interpretation contact: the perceived meaning behind the gesture, or the
feature of a situation that catches our attention. And why does it catch our
attention? Because it fits, however briefly, the internal map of our pleasure/desire
territory or our anxiety, need, and socio-cultural biases. We don't know the
world, all we have is a map, our created one, one created on shaky grounds. And
that's the one that we need to get off.
As an experiment, put aside a few minutes
to explore your perceptions of the future and the past. How relevant and
helpful are they as guides? Witness the wash of impressions, pleasant,
unpleasant, embarrassing, or aspirational. Notice how they affect you,
emotionally and physically: you may find your eyes, forehead or mouth tighten;
there may be a surge in your chest. Relax these places so that your mind
doesn't latch onto any one impression; let the tide wash over. The past and the future are then experienced
as presently arising. Acknowledge the emotional flavour of the tides (such as
anxiety, regret or nostalgia) and notice that they, and any images that the
mind does latch onto, constantly require new pictures and stories to keep
flowing. The important footnote is: don't try to stop the feelings, the nagging
inner voice or unskilful images; attend to their bodily effects and keep relaxing
and gently opening as you feel the twitch and prick of contact impressions. As contact needs the activity of adding,
arguing, repressing or analysing, stop doing these. Instead hold the fluttering
of contact with still awareness and breathe through the nervous activity.
Although the past seems finished and inert,
and the future uncertain, their images are equally momentary and presently arising, like the glitter
of light on a breaking wave. If they have no real substance, how relevant and
helpful are they as guides to living? And without dismissing the need for temporal structures, can we not be
dominated by their emotional flavouring? Yes, if the wave isn't fed by fresh
input, the glitter doesn't occur. You stop the waves by working on contact
impressions in your body, and by asking yourself: 'Without the emotional surge, how true is this?' Then,
as future and past cease, you can take guidance from your present clarity and
good intentions.
How true then is the impression of myself
or any other? There isn't just one, there are waves. So you can repeat the
above process. Think of yourself, briefly, at work, having dinner, getting up
in the morning, relaxing, or arguing. Can any any of those impressions stay
solid and clear? Don't they require continual additional input 'then I said
this, then that happened'. To whom is all this happening anyway? Flash through
a few images of another person in the same way. You'll find that, even if you
do latch onto a particular impression of yourself or another, any image will
require ongoing reactions, comparison or narrative to keep it going.
Interpretation-contact, the map-maker, is scrawling a sketch that is never
completed; nor will it ever be – because it's drawing someone who isn't there.
No self/other image can't stay steady, because it isn't solid. If there is any abiding feature to the
pictures and descriptions, it is a sense of familiarity, and a certain range of
moods. The impression we have of another, fond or fearful, is really based on
our potential for affection and fear (and many other emotions). The familiarity
is really familiarity with the range of emotional colours through which the mind depicts self-other-future-past. Sometimes
the colouring is grim: the same old anxiety, aversion or despond. So the
meditative question, the liberating question, is: what would reality be without
this colouring?
The Buddha reckoned that you can't describe
it, because when contact ceases, there can be no description. But,
it's a weight off the mind and supremely peaceful. More to the point for aspirants is the advice that the
process of liberation allows us to start afresh with our lives. If we hold the
notions of time and identity in embodied awareness, the undercurrents of
regret, anxiety or impatience have no water to churn and they cease. That's the
point. Then we can use time and identity as a basis for useful attention and
clear, responsible intentions. That's a better way to draw a map.
However, the grip of familiar territory
with its habitual screenplay is powerful. So much so that for most people,
extended self-retreat isn't even recommended until one has a few years of
practice under one's belt. Instead shorter periods in touch with like-minded
friends and a teacher is more suitable. It's just too wild in there. For
experienced meditators, skilful contact is a requirement too, but they will be
able to find that through steady awareness of their body and its breathing, and
of their spiritual skills and strengths. In all cases, skilful contact is
needed to meet the spin of one's world and its underlying pressures: to be
something, have something, and get somewhere. But with skill, meeting one's
world offers spaciousness; it's a modest release.
Modest, because it's not all over with a
retreat. Certainly undercutting the basis of one’s world leaves less room for stuff to land, or to cause agitation. But I don't see any liberation as final or conclusive until you can walk
down the street without getting bitten by flies.
*****
*The Sutta-Nipata: trans. H. Saddhatissa, Curzon Press, London, 1985
** Buddha's Brain: Rick Hanson and Richard Mendius: New Harbinger, Oakland, 2009
*The Sutta-Nipata: trans. H. Saddhatissa, Curzon Press, London, 1985
** Buddha's Brain: Rick Hanson and Richard Mendius: New Harbinger, Oakland, 2009
Can you please explain this to me in another way? "If we hold the notions of time and identity in embodied awareness, the undercurrents of regret, anxiety or impatience have no water to churn and they cease."
ReplyDeleteI don't really understand what you mean by holding something in "embodied" awareness.
Thank you Venerable Ajahn Sucitto! :)
Thank you so much for writing while you are on retreat. I have been working through your writings since starting with Kamma and the end of Kamma last year during a class that two of our community mentors here in Sacramento held. Including Rude Awakenings-partly read while on retreat to India and Nepal last year have been finding your words so helpful. They help me see more clearly into the nature of what this mind experiences. You describe so exactly correctly what I experience inside this mind, heart and body. It's very helpful. I wish you very well as you continue you journey. Thank you so much. It is wonderful knowing there is a real live person who is working with this stuff of reality in such a wholesome, honest way
ReplyDeleteThank you Juan. It's good to clarify the jargon.
ReplyDelete“Embodied awareness” is an awareness, i.e. a conscious sensitivity, that is in touch with the feelings and energies in the body. Acknowledging and developing this was the great breakthrough that led the samana Gotama to Awakening. Prior to focusing on this, he had cultivated disembodying practices under two teachers, a path that led to formless absorptions, but not to an awareness that integrates the bodily experience in a skilful way. So mindfulness of breathing entails bringing awareness to a bodily process, and noting how the rhythm and subtle energy of breathing spreads a suffusive happiness through the mind. This clears the mind of obstructive moods. Knowledge of this sympathetic relationship between body and mind was largely unknown in the West until William James, a foundational figure in modern psychology noted that strong emotions are accompanied by bodily responses (such as changes in heart-beat, flushes in the skin, tension and so on). Actually a skilled meditator can discern impulses and moods through their effect on the body. This approach to mental phenomena curtails thinking about, judging, repressing or affirming them. One learns how breathing can
steady and calm them, and bring about release. From another angle, embodied awareness, using breathing as a tool, can also heighten positive mind-states and cause them to be sustained.
This understanding runs through several postings in this blog. For example: Sin, Sex and the Inner Tyrant, ( November 2104) Standing Like A Tree (May 2014) Surface, Depth and Beyond (March 2014)
Thank you so much for your time and help!
ReplyDeleteI actually feel like I personally realized this exact thing recently. I realized there is just an awareness i can abide in, separate from the thought faculty of the mind. I can start to see from contact, the mental fermintation begin; the web being spun. I still get pulled away frequently and end up back wandering unaware in thought. But then Sati will kick back in, reminds me to put effort into following the breath with awareness(mindfully). When this lapse of 'the one who knows' happens, transgression occurs. I like Ajahn Lee's method of breath meditation that thanissaro bhikkhu teaches. I find following the breath and body contemplation to be great for strengthening this awareness.
I'll read those blog posts you mentioned. Thank you again Ajahn Sucitto. May you see the wholesome as wholesome and unwholesome as unwholsome.
For further clarification: in terms of practice, one doesn't just drop the topic and go back to the breath ( although this may be useful step at times). What I'm referring to is a process of acknowledging ones thoughts, moods, impulses and energies and through 'deep attention' identifying the underlying mood or energy ( such as anxiety or anger). Then drop the topic, stay with the mood and refer to how that is affecting the body. When you find the bodily effect, you 'breathe through that', i.e. hold the breath-energy and the mind-energy in awareness. A insightful shift will occur by itself.
ReplyDeleteI have been experimenting with this over the past few days. It already is immensely useful. When strong emotions/activity are happening, i focus the awareness there, on the underlying feeling. I discern the activity as pleasurable/not pleasurable, notice the weight/tension in the mind and body. Spread the breath through that gently. Constantly exploring it with a mentality of "ah, it's like this. Such and such feeling is like 'this' ". Noticing when such and such a feeling arises, the body feels like this, the mind feels like this.
ReplyDeleteI am going to stay with thanissaro bikkhu and his fellow monks beginning of May, I will develop this further while I'm there. My first monastery experience, I am looking forward to it.
Thank you again, invaluable help! If my understanding is still missing the mark, feel free to delete this; i do not wish to confuse anyone who reads this if it is off base.
Really interesting and helpful to read questions and answers.
ReplyDeleteWould like to recommend one of Ajahn Sucittos talks called 'Energy'. Getting lost in thoughts, feelings and moods I sometimes get totally drained out of energy. http://www.cittaviveka.org/index.php/teaching/audio-talks/87-ajahn-sucitto-energy
This talk makes it very clear about the importance to keep mind, body and thought together as a team! Thank you. Wishing you all well.